Jobs Jobs Jobs

Moderators: shutout, evs' Boytoy, Irish Mike

51.Juggs » Sun Dec 31, 2017 3:37 am

So easy.

They are good first year numbers, but you can't really give trump much credit for it, much like you can't fault Obama for the first year.
You mean like how Clinton was given all the credit for walking into the dot com boom?
Quote

52.HG 2.0 » Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:28 pm

So easy.

They are good first year numbers, but you can't really give trump much credit for it, much like you can't fault Obama for the first year.
You mean like how Clinton was given all the credit for walking into the dot com boom?
And bush getting all the blame for the derivative crash that Clinton created?
Quote

53.52:20 » Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:43 pm

Yes, first year, bad or good, is more on the previous admin.
Quote

54.evs » Tue Jan 02, 2018 2:24 pm

Yes, first year, bad or good, is more on the previous admin.
yeah the first year it is 50-50. Some policies can affect things right away, or just the anticipation of policies (like the stock market going up for tax reform), but other things take time to affect.

vd is grasping, as usual.
Quote

55.52:20 » Tue Jan 02, 2018 2:30 pm

Yes, first year, bad or good, is more on the previous admin.
yeah the first year it is 50-50. Some policies can affect things right away, or just the anticipation of policies (like the stock market going up for tax reform), but other things take time to affect.

vd is grasping, as usual.
He's being trolled by Trump more so than anything. Snowflake works himself into a tizzy with every word Trump says.
Quote

User avatar 56.GFY » Tue Jan 02, 2018 7:14 pm

From what I recall, everything that was bad with the economy under Obama was blamed on what he had inherited from Bush. Now the economy is doing well, it was due to Obama. Which is it?
Quote

57.shutout » Tue Jan 02, 2018 7:19 pm

From what I recall, everything that was bad with the economy under Obama was blamed on what he had inherited from Bush. Now the economy is doing well, it was due to Obama. Which is it?
Maybe the intervening 8 years?
Quote

58.evs » Tue Jan 02, 2018 7:20 pm

From what I recall, everything that was bad with the economy under Obama was blamed on what he had inherited from Bush. Now the economy is doing well, it was due to Obama. Which is it?
Maybe the intervening 8 years?
:bananaburn:
Quote
Sort by

« Sports, Entertainment, and Everything Else